COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPEECH CULTURE IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK FORMAL COMMUNICATION

Авторы

  • O'g'iloy Ko'charboyeva Navoi State University
  • M.N. Nadjmiddinova Navoi State University

Аннотация

This study provides a comparative sociolinguistic analysis of speech culture in the English and Uzbek languages, focusing on formal communication contexts such as education, media, and public discourse. We examine verbal etiquette, discourse markers, and politeness strategies in each language, highlighting both similarities and differences shaped by sociocultural, historical, and linguistic influences. A qualitative methodology is employed, analyzing examples from real-life formal settings (classroom interactions, news media, official speeches) to illustrate how each language encodes respect, formality, and interpersonal cues. The analysis reveals that English formal communication often prioritizes globalized etiquette norms and indirect politeness, whereas Uzbek formal speech is deeply rooted in traditional etiquette, emphasizing respect, hierarchy, and emotional warmth in expression. Despite these differences, both languages share the fundamental goal of maintaining courteous relations and social harmony in formal contexts. This article contributes to cross-cultural pragmatics by detailing how English and Uzbek speakers navigate formal interactions, and by shedding light on the role of cultural values—such as English individualism and Uzbek collectivism—in shaping speech practices. The findings have practical implications for intercultural communication, particularly in educational and media settings, and suggest avenues for further research on speech culture across diverse languages.

Библиографические ссылки

1. Najmiddinova M.N., Najmiddinova G.N. “Pedagogical mechanisms for improving student knowledge with the help of Artificial Intelligence”. International journal of scientific researchers”. www.wordlyknowledge.uz. Volume: 2, Issue: 1, 2023.

2. Najmiddinova M.N., Najmiddinova S.N. “Ways to organize the activities of teachers in the process of distance Education”. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, ISSN: 2278-4853 Vol. 11, Issue 5, May 2022.

3. Najmiddinova M.N. “Practical basis of the problem of teaching foreign languages in high education system”. International Conference on Sustainable Development and Economics. June 24-25.

4. Najmiddinova M.N. Linguodidactic features of proverbs related to the concept of “hospitality” (Examples from English and Uzbek languages) // il va adabiyot.uz Ilmiy-metodik elektron jurnal. -tilvaadabiyotuz@gmail.com, 6-son.2025.-B.227-230. https: //oak.uz/pages/4802

5. Najmiddinova M.N., Furqatova H.A., Nabiyeva D.G‘. “Linguistic features of phraseological units with a common meaning “hospitality”, “Modern trends of teaching in the context of innovative and digital

6. technologies in higher education: prospects, problems and solutions”. November 29, 2024. –B.607-609.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14259715.

7. Najmiddinova M.N. “Linguocultural and linguopragmatic features of the concept of "hospitality" in English and Uzbek”//International conference Philology, Methodology, Translation Studies: Current Issues of Modern Science. -8-9.11.2024.-P.306-309.https://doi.org/10.2024/1xm0b673.

8. Najmiddinova M.N. “Linguoculturalogical features of proverbs on “hospitality” in English and Uzbek”, Tamaddun nuri // The light of civilization, ISSN 2181-8258, 10(61), 2024.-P.74-79. https://jurnal.tamaddunnuri.uz/index.php/tnj/article/view/972

9. Najmiddinova M.N., Qahramonova M.U. “Innovation in language teaching, learning and assessment” // Results of National Scientific Research International Journal, Volume 4| Issue 3 Researchbib 9.1, ISSN: 2181-3639,2025. -P.132-140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15111294

10. Najmiddinova M.N. “Mehmondo‘stlik” tushunchasiga oid maqollarning pragmatik tahlili//“Universal journal of social sciences philosophy and culture”. -https://scienceresearch.uz/index.php/UJSSPC/article/view/286 ISSN: 2992-8834 IMPACT FACTOR: 8.0,2025.-B.44-50.. https://zenodo.org/records/14732811

11. Najmiddinova M.N. Similarities and differences between values of Uzbek and English cultures // Tanqidiy nazar, tahliliy tafakkur va innovatsion g‘oyalar.2025.-B.107-111. https://phoenixpublication.net/index.php/TANQ/article/view/3802

12. Najmiddinova M.N., Rahmatova M.U. The role of Pragmatics in Intercultural Communication with an Emphasis on Politeness // Tamaddun Nuri/The light of civilization. -ISSN 2181-8258 IF-9.347 DOI 10.69691,4-son (67) 2025.-P.237-240. https://doi.org/10.2024/1xm0b673.

13. Najmiddinova M.N. Linguistic features of phraseological units with a common meaning "hospitality" // Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy xabarlar,3-son. ISBN: 978-9943-7182-7-2 “CLASSIC” nashriyoti.2025.-P.1886-1891. www.kspi.uz journal.kspi.uz

14. Najmiddinova M.N. Linguopragmatic analysis of phraseological units and idioms relating to the concept of hospitality in English and Uzbek //FarDu, Ilmiy xabarlar jurnali, ISSN 2181-1571.Volume 31 Issue 4, 2025. -P.73-84. DOI: 10.56292/SJFSU/vol31_iss4/a94. https://journal.fdu.uz/

15. Turdieva, M. I. Q., Morales Tenorio, A., & Anvarova, S. A. (2025). Expression of Communication Speech Etiquette in English and Uzbek Languages. European Scholar Journal, 6(3), 17–19. – An analytical overview of polite speech etiquette in English and Uzbek, highlighting cultural and linguistic factors in expressions of politeness.

16. Turdieva, M. I. Q., & Raximbekova, H. B. Q. (2025). Politeness in English and Uzbek Languages. Western European Journal of Linguistics and Education, 3(10), 64–66. – A comparative study focusing on address forms, requests, gratitude, and apology in English and Uzbek, demonstrating how politeness reflects each culture’s values.

17. Jo’rayeva, Z.R. (2022). National-Cultural Specifics of Speech Etiquette in English and Uzbek. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(June), 46–47. – Examines greeting and addressing expressions in English and Uzbek with examples, emphasizing how small talk content and etiquette formulas differ between the two languages.

18. Qo’chqarova, Y. (2025). The Role of Discourse Markers as Indicators of Social Relations in English and Uzbek Fiction. TADQIQOTLAR, 76(4), 263–266. – A qualitative analysis of discourse markers in English and Uzbek, highlighting that English markers often convey indirectness and personal stance, whereas Uzbek markers encode respect and hierarchy, reflecting sociopragmatic differences.

19. Salimova, M. S. (2025). Politeness Strategies in English and Uzbek Newspapers. LingvoSpectrum, 3(1), 171–177. – A study of media discourse revealing that Uzbek journalistic language tends to employ more indirect and formal politeness strategies (aligned with collectivist norms) compared to the more direct style of English news, especially in political reporting.

20. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press. – Foundational work proposing universal politeness strategies (positive and negative politeness) and the concept of face; provides a theoretical framework referenced in analyses of both English and Uzbek politeness.

21. Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. – A seminal book arguing that speech acts and politeness have culture-specific realizations; used in this study to underscore how English and Uzbek politeness norms are products of their distinct cultural contexts.

22. Fox, K. (2014). Watching the English: The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. London: Hodder & Stoughton. – An anthropological look at English social etiquette (including the use of weather as a conversational tool), providing insight into English small talk conventions referenced in contrast to Uzbek small talk practices.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-04-19